Hi Bben. Thanks for bringing up useability. I’m highly skeptical of there being any meaningful correlation between the amount of cognition required to process a phrase, and whether that phrase uses an active or passive construction. I do however agree with the overarching sentiment of Content Design London’s guide. And this is precisely why we often need the passive — to make things shorter, clearer, and reduce the cognitive load.

Take my examples of “Martin kicked the ball” versus “the ball was kicked.” In the latter, there are only two concepts the reader needs to hold in their head: an object (the ball) and an action (kicking). Yet if we force this sentence into the active voice, we’re forced to add a second object — the agent of the action — even if that information isn’t relevant. This means there are now two objects and one action for the user to process, increasing the cognitive load, and muddying the mental image with an unnecessary element.
So sometimes (not always, but sometimes) using the passive will make for clearer, more concise copy.

--

--

Linguaphile ~ pathological vacuumer

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Aaron S. Raizen

Aaron S. Raizen

Linguaphile ~ pathological vacuumer

More from Medium

Falling feels like flying until the bone crush.

The letters

Negative Opinions on the Serpent and the Sax

The Sweet Art of Doing Nothing